HUANZE

Domestic and foreign intellectual property rights

──Jan 05 , 2022Typical case review | 35171630, "micro eed VILEDA" trademark dispute case

Dissenter: Carl•Freudenberg Joint Ventures
Respondent: Guangzhou Balun Valley Technology Co., LTD
Trademark challenged: "Weilida VILEDA"
Specified commodity: No20Class "indoor shutter" etc
        The respondent fails to reply within the prescribed time limit. In accordance with Article 4 and Article 35 of the Trademark Law, the Trademark Office decides35171630"Little power to reach VILEDAThe trademark shall not be registered.

        Ringser's view:2019The revised Trademark Law has added a provision in Paragraph 1 of Article 4 that "any malicious trademark registration application not for the purpose of use shall be rejected". The purpose of the new clause is to resolutely curb malicious trademark registration applications "not for the purpose of use" and effectively regulate the order of trademark registration applications. In this case, the person opposed has applied for registration in several categories990The remaining trademarks, many of which are identical or similar to the original trademarks used by other companies. If the person opposed fails to submit the above trademark use evidence and trademark creation source, its behavior does not belong to the reasonable trademark reserve for the purpose of expanding the market, and the number and type of trademarks it applies for registration obviously exceed the normal demand of market subjects, it shall be deemed as "the behavior of not applying for trademark registration for the purpose of use" and be rejected. For more information about the trademark, please contact Lianze Consultant.

Review typical cases | The first35171630

       CycloseThe company is committed to providing corporate audit, tax declaration, registration, annual inspection, tax planning, intellectual property and other services for domestic and foreign customers in Hong Kong, Singapore, Dubai and other regions. Efficient, rigorous, intimate service has been favored by many private enterprises, listed companies and large state-owned enterprises.

BACK
PREV

The Little Red Book Company applied for the trademark of "Old Red Book". Why?

NEXT

Regarding the Case of Trademark Invalidation of "MOSCOW RESTAURANT" No. 11396497